Is Continuinous Intervention good management?

After last weeks absolutely awesome bogus jobs numbers out of the US, we thought we’d leave penning a note to assess market action in the follow up, it was worth the wait. Markets initially tanked! They tanked because the numbers were so good it increased the likelihood “The Fed” may change the meaning of the word “patient” in its statement next week, thus increasing the likelihood of a rate rise!
After a meaningful rally late Thursday, the market was selling off significantly in the US last night before aggressively (on no news) rallying in the final minutes of trade to end the week perfectly on VWAP!!!!(volume weighted average price). Naturally!!! This is quite common these days.

BF5843F9-04F6-44D1-9054-FA4C961FB6A0.png

Anyway, back to jobs report. A report, like most markets these days, completely engineered to keep the awesomeness meme in the face of a deteriorating economic reality.
We’ll give you some more examples today of the current meddling for you to ponder but the biggest aspect that you need to ponder is why! And what are the consequences of the massive distortions this is creating in financial markets?
Without an excellent jobs report, everything might might appear to be not so awesome and The Fed may may not be able to stick with the “we’re patiently waiting to raise rates” on the back of a strengthening economic outlook view.
Just before we move to the jobs report lets have a closer look at what a strengthening economic outlook looks like.
 EE1AF171-59D2-4448-B17B-3574D7C21597.png
Source: Bloomberg.
So, they left a few things out.
It’s hard to find a mainstream financial journalist willing to report on the mystery that the BLS (reporting agency) reported loss of jobs in the energy sector YTD as 2900, when evidence abounds of massive layoffs in the sector over the past few months. For example, outplacement firm Challenger Gray and Chirstmas report year to date job losses as 39621.

EC2C5ED1-C29C-42B1-A8EB-2C32F4ECFD8A.png

Add to this to the lowest job participation rate (long term unemployed to not get counted as unemployed anymore) in the US since 1973 as well lowest weekly hours worked over the same period to the fact that much of the reported rise in jobs comes from bartenders and waitresses. Ridiculous.
As usual, what the above demonstrates is an unusual commitment to mask the serious underlying systemic risks in our financial world. The global economy is in a very difficult circumstance and the Fed is at the heart of it.
We have a little more than usual money printing starting this month as the Europeans join the Japanese in the relentless money printing game. The question is, what will they buy? Maybe they’ll buy back some of that Sovereign debt with negative rates.
Here is an idea. It was revealed though the Wall Street journal this week that the Bank of Japan (BOJ) has stepped in into to buy stock ETF’s no less than 143 times when stocks have opened down since April 4 2013. Bullish.
This type of continued monetary intervention by Central Banks is the reason it pays to be diversified but be very aware of what you own and do it with minimum leverage.
Speaking of leverage, when reading the article below, replace Canada with Australia.

Wolf Richter   www.wolfstreet.com

Debt by Canadian households is a special phenomenon. Statistics Canada reported today that in the fourth quarter, household debt set another breath-taking record.

Earlier this month, even Equifax Canada, which is in the business of facilitating and increasing this indebtedness, had warned about it. The total indebtedness of Canadian households, according to its own measure, had jumped 7.7% from prior year, which had already been at record levels. The biggest culprits were installment and auto loans. Households are powering consumer spending, and thus the overall economy, with ever larger amounts of ultimately unsustainable debt.

A “a cautionary tale,” the report called it.

The rapid decline in oil prices caught many by surprise. And, that’s the point – consumers and business owners need to be more vigilant. When economic change happens, it can happen very quickly and can challenge previously observed stability of key economic and credit indicators.

In other words, as the price of oil collapsed, as housing stumbled, and as layoffs began – the “economic change” that “can happen very quickly” – the “stability” of different aspects of the economy, including household debt, is suddenly at risk. It’s a warning that consumers might buckle under that mountain of debt.

Now Statistics Canada weighed in. In Q4, household borrowing, on a seasonally adjusted basis, jumped by C$22.6 billion from the third quarter. Credit cards and auto loans accounted “for the majority of the overall increase.” Total household debt (consumer credit, mortgage, and non-mortgage loans) rose 1.1% from the prior quarter to C$1.825 trillion, with consumer credit hitting $519 billion and mortgage debt C$1.184 trillion.

And how did that impact households?

For the third consecutive quarter, disposable income increased at a slower rate than household credit market debt. As a result, leverage, as measured by household credit market debt to disposable income, reached a new high of 163.3% in the fourth quarter. In other words, households held roughly $1.63 of credit market debt for every dollar of disposable income in the fourth quarter.

For the moment, there is still one saving grace to this rising mountain of debt: interest rates have been coming down for years. So the debt service ratio, which measures household interest expense as a proportion of disable income, has been declining as a function of interest rates, though it inched up in Q4 to 6.8%

The chart shows how the ratio of debt to disposable income (red line, left scale) has been rising with a few exceptions, while the debt service ratio (blue line, right scale) has followed interest rates up and down:

Canada-household-leverage-indicators-1992-2014_Q4

The ratio of debt to disposable income picked up speed from 2001 on. It blew through the financial crisis even as US households were whittling down their debt by deleveraging and defaulting. Canadian households didn’t even stop to breathe. They kept spending and piled on debt at an astounding rate. Their incomes rose also, but not nearly enough. It wasn’t until 2011 that the red-hot growth rate started to lose some of its fire, bumping into all sorts of resistance from reality.

With interest rates getting pushed lower year after year, interest expense as a percent of disposable income – the debt to service ratio – has been declining. For the moment, these low interest rates keep the whole thing glued together.

And if interest rates ever rise even by a smidgen? The blue line would do what it started doing in 2006. It would roar higher. With consumer indebtedness at these levels, even a small increase in interest rates will make a big difference in the interest expense consumers would have to fork over.

The Bank of Canada – kicked into panic mode by the collapse of oil prices, the faltering housing market, vulnerable banks, and other nagging issues, including the indebtedness of the consumer, which it pointed out as a risk factor last year – suddenly cut its benchmark interest rate in January. In the past, it communicated such moves in advance. In January, it was a surprise move that shocked the markets.

Today, Rhys Mendes, Deputy Chief of the Bank of Canada’s Economic Analysis Department, told the House of Commons finance committee that the central bank would “not necessarily” be pressured into following the Fed’s rate increases this year. “The bank targets inflation in Canada, and decisions regarding monetary policy in Canada would be based on the outlook for inflation,” he said, presenting the central-bank smokescreen for keeping rates at near zero for other reasons.

The Bank of Canada will have trouble ever raising rates, regardless of the distortion and mayhem near-zero rates are causing. Households can no longer afford higher rates. They have too much debt and not enough income. Higher interest payments would eat into spending on other things. Higher mortgage rates would crash the still magnificent home prices. Consumers would buckle under their burden and default. Not to speak of the already struggling oil companies. And then there are the banks that have lent with utter abandon to all of them.

Years of low interest rates encouraged this dreadful level of leverage. Now it’s an albatross around the neck of the Bank of Canada, and for decades to come. And for the economy, it’s a high-risk burden that could quickly, as Equifax suggested, blow up.

Gravity is already very inconveniently inserting itself into Canada’s incredible housing boom.

Have a great weekend!

Leave a comment